A brief analysis on the Evidence of the Baptism of the Holy Spirit (Part 1)
by Ankit David
A friend of mine joined me over the phone today to put a question about “What is the Evidence of the Baptism of Holy Spirit”? Another question that he asked along with this was “Do I need to speak in tongues to have the Holy Spirit”?
This conversation was not a surprise to me as I have talked and discussed with so many other people who were confused like my friend with the Doctrine of the Baptism of the Holy Spirit that teaches about speaking in tongues as the primary evidence. But it was still disheartening for me when I sensed that my friend was confused. Because he was feeling that he may not be a Christian or perhaps a second-class Christian who doesn’t speak in tongues. But I know my friend and I can see that this is not the case. The witness of him being a Christian is not based on if he can or can’t speak in tongues. It’s based on the right Biblical evidence that reveal that a person is Baptized with the Holy Spirit. We will discuss those evidence in this short examination as this is the core purpose of creating an awareness with the right Doctrine of the Baptism of the Holy Spirit.
Let’s note first that the idea of speaking in tongues as the only evidence for the Baptism of the Holy Spirit is an old school perspective that comes from the fellow believers of certain denominations. Certainly not every denomination would hold to this view. We should also know that the view of speaking in tongues as the evidence of the Baptism of the Holy Spirit primarily comes from the phenomenal revival movement known as Azusa Street Revival under William J. Seymour. The beginning birth swing of Pentecostalism in the 20th century. Where Seymour’s groups encountered the Holy Spirit and then they began to speak in tongues and then Seymour started teaching that the evidence of the Holy Spirit Baptism is speaking in tongues.
We are not arguing here about the ceasing of speaking in tongues. Some of our cessationist Evangelicals brothers would surely argue about its ceasing. But that’s not the case. We as followers of Christ who believe in the Holy Spirit should obey what Paul commands “don’t forbid speaking in tongues” (1 Cor 14:39) and when we read 1 Corinthians 12-14 Paul would also make sure that speaking in tongues should not become a hindrance or confusion in the church. A clear indication that Paul was not trying to convince everyone to speak in tongues. Also, more clearly in 1 Corinthians 12:30 Paul would highlight that speaking in tongues is not meant for everyone “Do all speak in tongues?” and the answer is no. It’s a gift.
It’s also critical to learn that experiences don’t make doctrines. It is the Word alone that needs careful interpretation. Not that experiences are wrong or false. But we need to have an open mind and open heart that is willing to do a careful investigation to form any kind of Biblical teachings. It’s not that we are denying that speaking in tongue is not Biblica. Again, it is one of the gifts of the Holy Spirit that gives supernatural experience and is certainty powerful when practiced in a Spirit filled way.
Now let’s answer two main questions related to our examination for the evidence of the Baptism of the Holy Spirit:
First Question:
Do I need to speak in tongues to be a Christians or to be saved?
The answer is no! We need to understand and believe that a man is saved by faith alone. One of my favorite scriptures is from Romans 3:28 “For we maintain that a person is justified by faith apart from the works of the law.” Now if we hold to the idea of speaking in tongues as an instrument of Salvation, we will then contradict the doctrine of Justified by Faith alone. Therefore, the idea of speaking in tongues to be a Christian is misleading because the regenerating power or the Baptism Holy Spirit initiates Salvation without any works.
Some theologians would also disagree with this idea of the speaking in tongues as an initial sign for the Baptism of the Holy Spirit.
Dr. Martin Lloyd Jones highlights that the gift of tongues is not meant for all. (Martyn Lloyd Jones, God the Holy Spirit, 2002.)
J. Oswald Sanders "notes in the book of acts, that the speaking in tongues did not accompany the filling of the spirit. There are nine such occurrences, but Pentecost was the only occasion when tongues speaking resulted. Oswald says that there is no mention of the 300 converted at Pentecost receiving the gift, the great numbers of those whom Luke reports as coming to the faith are not said to have spoken in tongues. Oswald quotes Norman Grubb, who says; an examination of the New Testament does not support those who say that there must be visible evidence of the inducement of the spirit by the speaking in tongues.” (J. Oswald Sanders, the Holy Spirit and His Gifts. Grand Rapids, 1940.)
Even Catholic Pentecostals when enthusiastically embraced and experienced tongues, the Catholic insisted that speaking in tongues glossolalia is one of the gifts among many and not necessarily initial evidence. (Mark W Wilson, ed. Spirit and Renewal, Sheffield Academic Press, 1994.)
J.I. Packer comments that "those who know that glossolalia are not God's path for them and those for whom it is a proven enrichment should neither try to impose their own way on others, nor judge others inferior for being different, nor stagger if someone in their camp transfers to the other, believing that God has led him or her to do so. Those who pray with tongues and those who pray without tongues do it to the Lord; they stand or fall to their own master, not their fellow-servants; and in the same sense that there is in Christ neither Jew nor Greek, bond nor free, male nor female, so in Christ there is neither glossolalist nor non-glossolalist.” (J.I. Packer, Keep in Step with the Spirit. IVP, 1984).
We will also discuss the second important question next week. Highlighting the distinguishing marks of the Holy Spirit. Focusing on three important highlights that will helps to identify the evidence for the Baptism of the Holy Spirit.
CATEGORIES
OUR INSTAGRAM FEED
SHARE THE POST ON SOCIAL MEDIA